临床荟萃 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 589-594.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2025.07.002
收稿日期:2025-03-20
出版日期:2025-07-20
发布日期:2025-07-17
通讯作者:
刘胜华
E-mail:944130326@qq.com
Received:2025-03-20
Online:2025-07-20
Published:2025-07-17
Contact:
Liu Shenghua
E-mail:944130326@qq.com
摘要:
目的 探究胰岛素抵抗代谢评分(metabolic score for insulin resistance, METS-IR)对原发性高血压患者并发主动脉弓钙化(aortic arch calcification, AAC)的预测价值。方法 回顾性选取北京市仁和医院2022年2月-2025年2月收治的原发性高血压患者170例,依据Symeonidis法进行主动脉弓钙化评分(aortic arch calcification score, AoACS)评分测定,分为AoACS=0组(n=60)、AoACS=1组(n=46)、AoACS=2组(n=33)和AoACS=3组(n=31)。比较吸烟史、饮酒史、糖尿病史、性别、年龄、血压、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C)、空腹血糖(fasting plasma glucose, FPG),分析各指标与原发性高血压患者并发AAC的相关性及预测价值。结果 4组饮酒史占比、性别、甘油三酯水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组吸烟史占比、糖尿病史占比、年龄、舒张压、收缩压、LDL-C水平、HDL-C水平、FPG水平、BMI、METS-IR差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以METS-IR、吸烟史、糖尿病史、年龄、LDL-C、HDL-C、FPG、BMI、收缩压、舒张压作自变量,行有序logistic回归分析;结果表明,HDL-C为AAC的保护性因素,其余指标均为AAC的危险因素(P<0.05)。绘制受试者工作特征曲线显示,METS-IR水平预测原发性高血压并发AAC的曲线下面积为0.92,特异度96.67%,敏感度80.00%(P<0.001)。结论 METS-IR、年龄、吸烟、LDL-C、糖尿病史、FPG、BMI、收缩压、舒张压为AAC的危险因素,HDL-C为AAC的保护性因素;METS-IR预测价值更高。
中图分类号:
刘胜华. 胰岛素抵抗代谢评分对原发性高血压患者并发主动脉弓钙化的预测价值[J]. 临床荟萃, 2025, 40(7): 589-594.
Liu Shenghua. The predictive value of the metabolic score for insulin resistance in essential hypertension patients complicated by aortic arch calcification[J]. Clinical Focus, 2025, 40(7): 589-594.
| 项目 | AoACS=0组 (n=60) | AoACS=1组 (n=46) | AoACS=2组 (n=33) | AoACS=3组 (n=31) | χ2值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 吸烟史[例(%)] | 21(35.00) | 18(39.13) | 20(60.61)* | 22(70.97)*# | 3.533 | 0.002 |
| 饮酒史[例(%)] | 24(40.00) | 24(52.17) | 18(54.55) | 22(70.97) | 1.231 | 0.177 |
| 糖尿病史[例(%)] | 19(31.67) | 22(47.83) | 18(54.55)* | 19(61.29)* | 2.214 | 0.030 |
| 男性[例(%)] | 23(38.33) | 22(47.83) | 17(51.52) | 18(58.06) | 1.256 | 0.172 |
| 年龄(岁) | 58.6±10.72 | 58.85±9.01 | 61.52±9.81 | 70.65±5.72*#△ | 3419.919 | <0.001 |
| 舒张压(mmHg) | 92.52±3.34 | 97.46±4.51* | 102.60±4.40*# | 107.00±2.59*#△ | 5002.699 | <0.001 |
| 收缩压(mmHg) | 146.90±4.76 | 156.80±5.72* | 167.20±4.88*# | 170.70±7.90*# | 15309.362 | <0.001 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.57±0.44 | 1.81±0.48 | 1.74±0.23 | 1.84±0.53 | 1.310 | 0.084 |
| LDL-C(mmol/L) | 3.47±0.77 | 3.65±0.95 | 4.37±0.34*# | 4.69±0.81*# | 64.787 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.43±0.32 | 1.31±0.29 | 1.22±0.37* | 1.23±0.33* | 1.430 | 0.001 |
| FPG(mmol/L) | 6.51±1.30 | 6.74±1.79 | 7.51±1.29* | 8.21±2.17*#△ | 70.123 | <0.001 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 21.07±2.22 | 23.69±2.09* | 25.36±4.23* | 28.68±4.02*#△ | 1048.057 | <0.001 |
| METS-IR | 30.57(28.73~31.62) | 36.16(33.85~38.62)* | 40.38(37.03~42.08)*# | 43.93(40.31~47.31)*#△ | 3934.159 | <0.001 |
表1 4组临床资料比较
Tab. 1 Clinical data among the four groups
| 项目 | AoACS=0组 (n=60) | AoACS=1组 (n=46) | AoACS=2组 (n=33) | AoACS=3组 (n=31) | χ2值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 吸烟史[例(%)] | 21(35.00) | 18(39.13) | 20(60.61)* | 22(70.97)*# | 3.533 | 0.002 |
| 饮酒史[例(%)] | 24(40.00) | 24(52.17) | 18(54.55) | 22(70.97) | 1.231 | 0.177 |
| 糖尿病史[例(%)] | 19(31.67) | 22(47.83) | 18(54.55)* | 19(61.29)* | 2.214 | 0.030 |
| 男性[例(%)] | 23(38.33) | 22(47.83) | 17(51.52) | 18(58.06) | 1.256 | 0.172 |
| 年龄(岁) | 58.6±10.72 | 58.85±9.01 | 61.52±9.81 | 70.65±5.72*#△ | 3419.919 | <0.001 |
| 舒张压(mmHg) | 92.52±3.34 | 97.46±4.51* | 102.60±4.40*# | 107.00±2.59*#△ | 5002.699 | <0.001 |
| 收缩压(mmHg) | 146.90±4.76 | 156.80±5.72* | 167.20±4.88*# | 170.70±7.90*# | 15309.362 | <0.001 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.57±0.44 | 1.81±0.48 | 1.74±0.23 | 1.84±0.53 | 1.310 | 0.084 |
| LDL-C(mmol/L) | 3.47±0.77 | 3.65±0.95 | 4.37±0.34*# | 4.69±0.81*# | 64.787 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | 1.43±0.32 | 1.31±0.29 | 1.22±0.37* | 1.23±0.33* | 1.430 | 0.001 |
| FPG(mmol/L) | 6.51±1.30 | 6.74±1.79 | 7.51±1.29* | 8.21±2.17*#△ | 70.123 | <0.001 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 21.07±2.22 | 23.69±2.09* | 25.36±4.23* | 28.68±4.02*#△ | 1048.057 | <0.001 |
| METS-IR | 30.57(28.73~31.62) | 36.16(33.85~38.62)* | 40.38(37.03~42.08)*# | 43.93(40.31~47.31)*#△ | 3934.159 | <0.001 |
| 变量 | 赋值 |
|---|---|
| 因变量 | |
| AoACS得分 | 1=未见钙化影组,2=小点状或单个薄片状钙化影组,3=一个或多个区域的粗钙化影组,4=环形钙化影组 |
| 自变量 | |
| 糖尿病史 | 1=无病史,2=有病史 |
| 吸烟史 | 1=无,2=有 |
| 年龄 | 连续性变量 |
| LDL-C | 连续性变量 |
| HDL-C | 连续性变量 |
| FPG | 连续性变量 |
| BMI | 连续性变量 |
| 收缩压 | 连续性变量 |
| 舒张压 | 连续性变量 |
| METS-IR | 连续性变量 |
表2 有序logistic回归分析因变量与自变量的赋值
Tab.2 Ordinal logistic regression analysis of the assignment of dependent variables and independent variables
| 变量 | 赋值 |
|---|---|
| 因变量 | |
| AoACS得分 | 1=未见钙化影组,2=小点状或单个薄片状钙化影组,3=一个或多个区域的粗钙化影组,4=环形钙化影组 |
| 自变量 | |
| 糖尿病史 | 1=无病史,2=有病史 |
| 吸烟史 | 1=无,2=有 |
| 年龄 | 连续性变量 |
| LDL-C | 连续性变量 |
| HDL-C | 连续性变量 |
| FPG | 连续性变量 |
| BMI | 连续性变量 |
| 收缩压 | 连续性变量 |
| 舒张压 | 连续性变量 |
| METS-IR | 连续性变量 |
| 自变量 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METS-IR | 0.405 | 0.042 | 93.404 | <0.001 | 1.50 | 0.323~0.488 |
| 吸烟史 | 1.015 | 0.286 | 12.611 | <0.001 | 2.76 | 0.455~1.575 |
| 糖尿病史 | 0.835 | 0.283 | 8.681 | 0.003 | 2.30 | 0.279~1.390 |
| 年龄 | 0.071 | 0.015 | 23.087 | <0.001 | 1.07 | 0.042~0.100 |
| LDL-C | 1.723 | 0.216 | 63.492 | <0.001 | 5.60 | 1.299~2.147 |
| HDL-C | -2.026 | 0.518 | 15.267 | <0.001 | 0.13 | -3.042~-1.01 |
| FPG | 0.394 | 0.086 | 20.896 | <0.001 | 1.48 | 0.225~0.564 |
| BMI | 0.480 | 0.057 | 71.710 | <0.001 | 1.62 | 0.369~0.591 |
| 收缩压 | 0.311 | 0.032 | 94.539 | <0.001 | 1.36 | 0.248~0.373 |
| 舒张压 | 0.411 | 0.042 | 96.812 | <0.001 | 1.51 | 0.329~0.493 |
表3 AAC影响因素的有序logistic回归分析
Tab. 3 Ordinal logistic regression analysis of influencing factors for AAC
| 自变量 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | Waldχ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METS-IR | 0.405 | 0.042 | 93.404 | <0.001 | 1.50 | 0.323~0.488 |
| 吸烟史 | 1.015 | 0.286 | 12.611 | <0.001 | 2.76 | 0.455~1.575 |
| 糖尿病史 | 0.835 | 0.283 | 8.681 | 0.003 | 2.30 | 0.279~1.390 |
| 年龄 | 0.071 | 0.015 | 23.087 | <0.001 | 1.07 | 0.042~0.100 |
| LDL-C | 1.723 | 0.216 | 63.492 | <0.001 | 5.60 | 1.299~2.147 |
| HDL-C | -2.026 | 0.518 | 15.267 | <0.001 | 0.13 | -3.042~-1.01 |
| FPG | 0.394 | 0.086 | 20.896 | <0.001 | 1.48 | 0.225~0.564 |
| BMI | 0.480 | 0.057 | 71.710 | <0.001 | 1.62 | 0.369~0.591 |
| 收缩压 | 0.311 | 0.032 | 94.539 | <0.001 | 1.36 | 0.248~0.373 |
| 舒张压 | 0.411 | 0.042 | 96.812 | <0.001 | 1.51 | 0.329~0.493 |
| 指标 | AUC | 截断值 | 95%CI | 特异度(%) | 敏感度(%) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 收缩压 | 0.96 | 153.50 | 0.933~0.986 | 95.00 | 89.09 | <0.001 |
| METS-IR | 0.92 | 35.41 | 0.716 ~ 0.864 | 96.67 | 80.00 | <0.001 |
| 舒张压 | 0.91 | 96.50 | 0.865~0.950 | 85.00 | 80.00 | 0.002 |
| BMI | 0.84 | 22.62 | 0.664 ~ 0.869 | 78.33 | 77.27 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C | 0.73 | 3.92 | 0.646 ~ 0.856 | 76.76 | 69.09 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C | 0.67 | 1.20 | 0.628 ~ 0.842 | 75.00 | 56.36 | <0.001 |
| FPG | 0.64 | 6.85 | 0.541 ~ 0.773 | 66.67 | 59.09 | 0.003 |
| 年龄 | 0.62 | 60.50 | 0.529~0.708 | 61.67 | 59.09 | 0.011 |
表4 各指标对原发性高血压患者并发AAC的预测价值
Tab.4 The predictive value of each index for AAC in patients with essential hypertension
| 指标 | AUC | 截断值 | 95%CI | 特异度(%) | 敏感度(%) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 收缩压 | 0.96 | 153.50 | 0.933~0.986 | 95.00 | 89.09 | <0.001 |
| METS-IR | 0.92 | 35.41 | 0.716 ~ 0.864 | 96.67 | 80.00 | <0.001 |
| 舒张压 | 0.91 | 96.50 | 0.865~0.950 | 85.00 | 80.00 | 0.002 |
| BMI | 0.84 | 22.62 | 0.664 ~ 0.869 | 78.33 | 77.27 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C | 0.73 | 3.92 | 0.646 ~ 0.856 | 76.76 | 69.09 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C | 0.67 | 1.20 | 0.628 ~ 0.842 | 75.00 | 56.36 | <0.001 |
| FPG | 0.64 | 6.85 | 0.541 ~ 0.773 | 66.67 | 59.09 | 0.003 |
| 年龄 | 0.62 | 60.50 | 0.529~0.708 | 61.67 | 59.09 | 0.011 |
| [1] | 范浩, 林璐璐, 马思明, 等. 针刺治疗原发性高血压病的机制研究进展[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2020, 31(4): 932-935. |
| [2] | 周菁, 付渊博, 宋玉强, 等. 针刺参与缺血性脑卒中二级预防的研究进展[J]. 针刺研究, 2024, 49(6): 625-633. |
| [3] | Zeng J, Zhang T, Yang Y, et al. Association between a metabolic score for insulin resistance and hypertension: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2016 analyses[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 15(4):1369600. |
| [4] | 李世杰, 张诗雨, 李雪, 等. 益气活血方防治慢性肾脏病的研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(24): 8241-8251. |
| [5] | 田昕彤, 周巍, 杨继, 等. 钩藤及其配伍制剂治疗高血压的研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(13): 4395-4403. |
| [6] | Qian T, Sheng X, Shen P, et al. Mets-IR as a predictor of cardiovascular events in the middle-aged and elderly population and mediator role of blood lipids[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14(7): 1224967. |
| [7] |
Zhang S, Wu Z, Zhuang Y, et al. The metabolic score for insulin resistance in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: A multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2023, 15(1): 157.
doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01133-7 pmid: 37461067 |
| [8] |
Islam MS, Wei P, Sujzauddula M, et al. The interplay of factors in metabolic syndrome: Understanding its roots and complexity[J]. Mol Med, 2024, 30(1): 279.
doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-01019-y pmid: 39731011 |
| [9] | Guo D, Zhang C, Zhang M, et al. Metabolic score for insulin resistance predicts major adverse cardiovascular event in premature coronary artery disease[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2024, 16(7): 6364-6383. |
| [10] | 伍晓梅, 朱玲, 吴琳娜. 原发性高血压患者胰岛素抵抗与抗心磷脂抗体的分析[J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(07): 1064-1067. |
| [11] | 郎博. 空腹血糖受损患者胰岛素抵抗与血压的相关性研究[D]. 重庆: 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学, 2020. |
| [12] |
Symeonidis G, Papanas N, Giannakis I, et al. Gravity of aortic arch calcification as evaluated in adult Greek patients[J]. Int Angiol, 2002, 21(3): 233-236.
pmid: 12384643 |
| [13] | 高血压精准化诊疗专家共识组成员, 老年心脑血管病教育部重点实验室. 高血压精准化诊疗中国专家共识(2024)[J]. 中华高血压杂志(中英文), 2024, 32(6): 505-519. |
| [14] | 刘陆, 王贻琳, 肖顺丽, 等. 基于机械力离子通道Piezo1的中药生物力药理学研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2023, 29(10): 235-244. |
| [15] | 李浩, 吴勉华, 马艳霞, 等. 中药调控铁死亡抑制肝纤维化的研究进展[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2023, 39(6): 587-593. |
| [16] | 于丽, 卫靖靖, 朱明军, 等. 心力衰竭风险预警模型研究进展[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2023, 43(6): 752-756. |
| [17] | 龙英全, 钟秋安, 潘姣姣, 等. 吸烟对男性人群体质指数与血压关系的影响[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2015, 19(3): 218-221. |
| [18] | 肖谷雨, 姚姜羽, 冯群, 等. 参芪降糖颗粒治疗糖尿病肾病的临床疗效及作用机制研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(19): 6469-6481. |
| [19] | Gong Y, Luo H, Li Z, et al. Metabolic profile of Alzheimer's disease: Is 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid a pertinent metabolic adjuster?[J]. Metabolites, 2023, 13(8):954. |
| [20] | Li D, Fan C, Li X, et al. The role of macrophage polarization in vascular calcification[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2024, 710(5): 149863. |
| [21] | 高慧, 于露. 参芪降糖颗粒对2型糖尿病模型大鼠血糖血脂的改善作用及其量效关系研究[J]. 中国药房, 2016, 27(13): 1801-1803. |
| [22] |
北京高血压防治协会, 中国老年学和老年医学学会, 北京市社区卫生协会, 等. 成人高血压合并2型糖尿病和血脂异常基层防治中国专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(28):3453-3475+3482.
doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0116 |
| [23] | 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟(中国), 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会高血压病学分会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南(2024年修订版)[J]. 中华高血压杂志(中英文), 2024, 32(7):603-700. |
| [24] | 赵承启, 邹伟. 中医药调控细胞焦亡干预缺血性脑卒中的研究进展[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2023, 43(9):1742-1748. |
| [25] | 徐思雨, 林建国, 孙梓宜, 等. 临界性高血压研究进展及思考[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2024, 44(4):504-512. |
| [26] | 张可, 蒋慕蓉, 杨文丽, 等. 黄酮类化合物改善糖尿病周围神经病变机制研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2024, 55(10):3539-3548. |
| [27] | Onyango AN. Cellular stresses and stress responses in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018, 2018(7): 4321714. |
| [28] | 谢菲, 高歌, 张成敏. 血清空腹血清胰岛素、Ca2+、脂联素在妊娠期高血压中的表达及临床意义[J]. 江苏预防医学, 2020, 31(2):145-147+151. |
| [29] | 解静, 牛美芝, 张蕊. T2DM合并高血压病人NAGL、sfrp5、ACE水平变化及与左心室重构的关系探讨[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 18(8):1270-1272. |
| [30] | 王旭开, 蔡鹏. 胰岛素抵抗是高血压的原因抑或结果?[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2020, 28(4):302-307. |
| [31] | 衷锐, 骆晓敏, 姚娟丽, 等. 盐酸吡格列酮胶囊联合缬沙坦胶囊对代谢综合征患者血压水平及胰岛素抵抗的影响[J]. 临床医学工程, 2019, 26(12):1675-1676. |
| [32] | 陈雪蓉, 沈冉, 靳晴, 等. 血清ANGPTL4、ANGPTL6水平与妊娠期糖尿病胰岛素抵抗的相关性研究[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2019, 27(12):1686-1689. |
| [33] |
Amaro R, Perea L, Sibila O. Future directions in bronchiectasis research[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2022, 43(1): 179-187.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2021.12.005 pmid: 35236557 |
| [34] | Tamehri Zadeh SS, Cheraghloo N, Masrouri S, et al. Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance and clinical outcomes: Insights from the Tehran lipid and glucose study[J]. Nutr Metab (Lond), 2024, 21(1): 34. |
| [35] | Popad D, Gherasim A, Caba L, et al. Cathelicidin: Insights into Its impact on metabolic syndrome and chronic inflammation[J]. Metabolites, 2024, 14(12):672. |
| [36] |
Foda AM, Ibrahim SS, Ibrahim SM, et al. Pterostilbene ameliorates cognitive impairment in polycystic ovary syndrome rat model through improving insulin resistance via the IRS-1/PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway: A comparative study with metformin[J]. ACS Chem Neurosci, 2024, 15(16): 3064-3077.
doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00352 pmid: 39119909 |
| [37] | Gowda PC, Lobner K, Hafezi-nejad N, et al. Bibliometric analysis of interventional radiology studies in PubMed-indexed literature from 1991 to 2020[J]. Clin Imaging, 2022, 85(5): 43-47. |
| [38] | Radu F, Potcovaru CG, Salmen T, et al. The link between NAFLD and metabolic syndrome[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2023, 13(4):614. |
| [39] |
Pacini G, Mari A. Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003, 17(3): 305-322.
doi: 10.1016/s1521-690x(03)00042-3 pmid: 12962688 |
| [40] |
Lin D, Qi Y, Huang C, et al. Associations of lipid parameters with insulin resistance and diabetes: A population-based study[J]. Clin Nutr, 2018, 37(4): 1423-1429.
doi: S0261-5614(17)30229-7 pmid: 28673690 |
| [41] |
Bello-chavolla OY, Almeda-valdes P, Gomez-velasco D, et al. METS-IR, a novel score to evaluate insulin sensitivity, is predictive of visceral adiposity and incident type 2 diabetes[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2018, 178(5): 533-544.
doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0883 pmid: 29535168 |
| [42] | Zhang X, Liu F, Li W, et al. Metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and ischemic cardiomyopathy[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2023, 16(5): 1283-1295. |
| [43] | Rao K, Yang J, Wu M, et al. Association between the metabolic score for insulin resistance and hypertension in adults: A meta-analysis[J]. Horm Metab Res, 2023, 55(4): 256-265. |
| [44] |
Zhang M, Liu D, Qin P, et al. Association of metabolic score for insulin resistance and its 6-year change with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. J Diabetes, 2021, 13(9): 725-734.
doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13161 pmid: 33644990 |
| [45] | Wu Z, CuiI H, Li W, et al. Comparison of three non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes in predicting the presence and severity of coronary artery disease[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 918359. |
| [46] | Cheng H, Yu X, Li YT, et al. Association between METS-IR and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus among elderly subjects in China: A large-scale population-based study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023, 20(2):1053. |
| [47] | Xu C, Song G, Hu D, et al. Association of METS-IR with incident hypertension in non-overweight adults based on a cohort study in Northeastern China[J]. Eur J Public Health, 2022, 32(6): 884-890. |
| [48] |
Zhang X, Yu C, Ye R, et al. Correlation between non-insulin-based insulin resistance indexes and the risk of prehypertension: A cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2022, 24(5): 573-581.
doi: 10.1111/jch.14449 pmid: 35411676 |
| [49] | Hu X, Han P, Liu Y. Metabolic status and hypertension: The Impact of insulin resistance-related indices on blood pressure regulation and hypertension risk[J]. J Am Nutr Assoc, 2025: 1-11. |
| [1] | 司会莉, 郭爽, 董浩铖, 李树仁. JP2与原发性高血压患者心房颤动的相关性[J]. 临床荟萃, 2025, 40(6): 504-508. |
| [2] | 尹贻锟, 尹逊伟, 王佳林, 孙君志. 太极拳锻炼周期对原发性高血压的血压及心血管危险因素的影响:系统性评价和Meta分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2022, 37(7): 599-606. |
| [3] | 赫连曼,刘敏,王浩,孟凡森,王梦琳. 原发性高血压患者红细胞分布宽度与血压水平、中心动脉压及血压变异性的相关性[J]. 临床荟萃, 2020, 35(8): 684-688. |
| [4] | 俞烜华;李忆农. 系统性红斑狼疮心脏受累85例超声心动图的临床特征分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2010, 25(13): 1119-1122. |
| [5] | 李春玉;张学武;胡国启. 安徽界首市41例恙虫病的临床分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2009, 24(14): 1258-1260. |
| [6] | 谢慧群;葛军;曾小军;徐芸;彭珊珊;龚志红. 89例脑寄生虫病回顾性分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2008, 23(15): 1099-0. |
| [7] | 危小军;廖伟;钟一鸣;廖祥中;谢东明;王小萍;谢东阳. 床旁紧急临时心脏起搏治疗严重缓慢性心律失常疗效及安全性评价[J]. 临床荟萃, 2007, 22(3): 182-183. |
| [8] | 石小燕;郝冬琴;李丽华. 特拉唑嗪对原发性高血压患者胰岛素抵抗的影响[J]. 临床荟萃, 2002, 17(21): 1243-1244. |
| [9] | 郑勇;靳艳. 肾性高血压与原发性高血压动态血压监测对比分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2001, 16(7): 291-0. |
| [10] | 黄桂忠;朱西湘;张婕好;黄丽霞. 高血压30年病程新旧标准对照分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2001, 16(21): 964-965. |
| [11] | 占伊扬;钱卫冲;王海燕. 原发性高血压患者血管紧张素转换酶基因多态性与胰岛素抵抗的关系[J]. 临床荟萃, 2000, 15(2): 51-52. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
