临床荟萃 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 135-139.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2026.02.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

结直肠癌不同微卫星不稳定性状态患者临床病理特征及KRAS、NRAS、BRAF基因突变

张一帆(), 王宁, 宋展, 徐恩松   

  1. 南阳市中心医院 肺部肿瘤科,河南 南阳 473000
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-03 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 张一帆, Email: zyf958462@126.com

Clinicopathological characteristics and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation profiles by microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer

Zhang Yifan(), Wang Ning, Song Zhan, Xu Ensong   

  1. Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang 473000, China
  • Received:2025-12-03 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-03-05
  • Contact: Zhang Yifan, Email: zyf958462@126.com

摘要:

目的 探究结直肠癌不同微卫星不稳定性状态患者临床病理特征及KRAS、NRAS、BRAF基因突变情况。方法 回顾性分析2020年4月-2025年4月在南阳市中心医院就诊的204例结直肠癌患者的临床资料,检测微卫星不稳定性状态、KRAS、NRAS、BRAF基因突变情况。根据微卫星不稳定性状态分为高不稳定型组(≥2个位点异常,n=31)、稳定型/低不稳定型组(<2个位点不稳定,n=173),比较两组临床病理特征、KRAS、NRAS、BRAF基因突变情况。行多因素logistic回归分析,分析结直肠癌患者微卫星高不稳定性状态的危险因素,并评估结直肠癌患者微卫星不稳定性状态与基因突变的相关性。结果 两组年龄、肿瘤分化程度、原发肿瘤部位、肿瘤TNM分期差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组NRAS基因突变差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),高不稳定型组KRAS基因突变率低于稳定型/低不稳定型组,BRAF基因突变率高于稳定型/低不稳定型组(P<0.05)。经logistic回归分析,低龄、原发肿瘤部位为右半结肠、TNM分期II期、肿瘤分化程度低、KRAS基因突变低表达、BRAF基因突变高表达为结直肠癌微卫星高不稳定性状态的危险因素(P<0.05)。经Spearman相关性分析,KRAS基因突变与微卫星不稳定性状态呈负相关,BRAF基因突变与微卫星不稳定性状态呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论 结直肠癌患者不同微卫星不稳定性状态临床病理特征与KRAS、BRAF基因突变相关,低龄、原发部位为右半结肠、TNM分期II期、肿瘤低分化、KRAS基因突变低表达、BRAF基因突变高表达为微卫星高不稳定性危险因素。

关键词: 结直肠癌, 微卫星不稳定性状态, 病理特征, 基因突变

Abstract:

Objective To examine the clinicopathological characteristics and the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients stratified by microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 204 consecutive CRC patients treated at Nanyang Central Hospital between April 2020 and April 2025. MSI status and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations were determined. Patients were classified as MSI-high (MSI-H; ≥2 unstable loci, n=31) or MSI-low/stable (MSI-L/MSS; <2 unstable loci, n=173). Clinicopathological variables and mutation frequencies were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of MSI-H status. Associations between MSI status and gene mutations were assessed by Spearman correlation. Results Significant differences were observed between MSI-H and MSI-L/MSS groups in patient age, tumor differentiation, primary tumor site, and tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage (all P<0.05). NRAS mutation frequency did not differ between groups (P>0.05). MSI-H tumors showed a significantly lower frequency of KRAS mutations and a higher frequency of BRAF mutations compared with MSI-L/MSS tumors (P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, younger age, right-sided primary tumor location, TNM stage II, poor tumor differentiation, lower KRAS mutation frequency, and higher BRAF mutation frequency were independently associated with MSI-H status (P<0.05). Spearman correlation confirmed a negative correlation between KRAS mutation and MSI status and a positive correlation between BRAF mutation and MSI status (P<0.05). Conclusion MSI status in colorectal cancer is associated with distinct clinicopathological features and mutation profiles. MSI-H tumors are more likely in younger patients, to arise in the right colon, to present at stage II, and to be poorly differentiated; they are also characterized by lower KRAS mutation prevalence and higher BRAF mutation prevalence.

Key words: colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability state, pathological feature, gene mutation

中图分类号: