临床荟萃 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 881-890.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2026.10.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国中老年人时变主客观健康不一致与新发抑郁的前瞻性队列研究

王启龙, 齐鑫, 赵东荣()   

  1. 甘肃省人民医院 精神卫生科, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2026-09-30 出版日期:2026-10-20 发布日期:2026-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 赵东荣 E-mail:13919131767@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省疾病预防控制科研项目——甘肃省重大公共卫生事件下公众应激综合征防控研究(GSJKKY2025-26);甘肃省人民医院院内科研基金——基于多模态磁共振成像的胃肠道肿瘤伴抑郁特征量化研究(23GSSYD-24);甘肃中医药大学研究生创新创业基金项目——针刺治疗抑郁症的认知控制脑网络交互机制研究(2026CXCY-112)

A prospective cohort study of time-updated discrepancies between subjective and objective health and incident depressive symptoms in Chinese middle-aged and older adults

Wang Qilong, Qi Xin, Zhao Dongrong()   

  1. Department of Mental Health, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2026-09-30 Online:2026-10-20 Published:2026-10-10
  • Contact: Zhao Dongrong E-mail:13919131767@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨中国中老年人群时变主客观健康表型与新发抑郁症状风险的前瞻性关联。方法 基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS,2011-2020年),纳入基线年龄≥50岁且无抑郁症状的受试者6 193人,共贡献15 892个人-周期。结合自评健康与慢性病共病界定4类时变表型,采用离散时间互补双对数生存模型分析风险。结果 随访期间新发抑郁症状2 845例。全调整模型显示,相对于自评良好且无共病组,自评不良且无共病组(HR=1.54,95%CI:1.39~1.71)、自评良好伴共病组(HR=1.40,95%CI:1.14~1.71)和自评不良且伴共病组(HR=2.11,95%CI:1.88~2.36)风险均升高,交互检验均差异未达到统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 时变主客观健康表型与新发抑郁症状风险相关,自评不良且伴共病者风险最高。联合评估主客观健康状况有助于识别高风险人群。

关键词: 自评健康, 慢性病共病, 健康不一致, 抑郁症状, 前瞻性队列研究

Abstract:

Objective To examine the prospective effect of time-updated discrepancies between subjective and objective health on incident depression in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. Methods Based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2020), 6 193 middle-aged and older participants aged ≥50 years without depression at baseline were included (15 892 person-periods). Four time-updated phenotypes were defined by self-rated health and chronic disease comorbidity. A discrete-time complementary log-log survival model was used to evaluate the risk of depression. Results During follow-up, 2 845 incident depression cases occurred. In the fully adjusted model, compared with the group with good self-rated health and no comorbidity, the risk of incident depression was significantly increased in the group with poor self-rated health and no comorbidity (HR=1.54, 95%CI: 1.39-1.71), the group with good self-rated health but with comorbidity (HR=1.40, 95%CI: 1.14-1.71), and the group with poor self-rated health and comorbidity (HR=2.11, 95%CI: 1.88-2.36). No significant interactions were observed across clinical subgroups (all interaction P>0.05). Conclusion Health phenotypes were associated with incident depressive symptoms; the highest risk was observed among individuals with both poor self-rated health and multimorbidity. Joint evaluation of subjective and objective health may help identify individuals at elevated risk of depressive symptoms.

Key words: self-rated health, chronic disease multimorbidity, health discordance, depressive symptoms, prospective cohort study

中图分类号: