临床荟萃 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 910-915.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2026.10.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

奥氮平联合奥沙西泮用于精神分裂症伴焦虑症状患者:一项疗效动态变化与安全性的回顾性对照研究

蔡蕃灿, 吴海强()   

  1. 福州市第二总医院神经精神病防治院, 福建 福州 350007
  • 收稿日期:2026-10-01 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 吴海强 E-mail:1349925359@qq.com

Olanzapine combined with oxazepam in patients with schizophrenia and anxiety symptoms: A retrospective controlled study of dynamic changes in efficacy and safety

Cai Fancan, Wu Haiqiang()   

  1. Neuro-Psychiatric Prevention and Treatment Hospital of Fuzhou Second General Hospital, Fuzhou 350007, China
  • Received:2026-10-01 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-10
  • Contact: Wu Haiqiang E-mail:1349925359@qq.com

摘要:

目的 比较奥氮平联合奥沙西泮(联合组)与单药奥氮平(单药组)治疗精神分裂症伴焦虑症状患者的治疗效果。方法 回顾性纳入2020年1月-2023年12月我院女性精神分裂症伴焦虑症状患者64例,联合组、单药组各32例。采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)分别于基线、第2周、第4周、第8周完成测评,比较两组疗效动态变化、症状改善相关性、有效率与缓解率的差异,以及观察治疗期间不良反应情况。结果 两组的时间主效应在HAMA、PANSS总分中均显著;PANSS 总分组别×时间交互效应显著,联合组自第2周起疗效优于单药组;HAMA仅组别主效应显著,组别与时间交互差异无统计学意义。各时间段 HAMA与PANSS 改善量整体无明显相关性,仅基线第2周HAMA减分与PANSS阳性症状减分呈弱相关。第4周联合组焦虑有效率71.88%高于单药组25.00%;第8周两组焦虑有效率均100.00%,仅联合组9.38%患者达到焦虑缓解。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 奥氮平联合奥沙西泮可加速精神分裂症伴焦虑症状患者早期精神病性症状改善,提升早期焦虑应答效率,不增加短期不良反应;但对焦虑长期完全缓解获益有限,焦虑与精神病性症状改善相对独立,建议奥沙西泮短期、早期、按需联用。

关键词: 精神分裂症, 焦虑, 奥氮平, 奥沙西泮, 不良反应

Abstract:

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of olanzapine combined with oxazepam (combination group) and olanzapine monotherapy (monotherapy group) in patients with schizophrenia and anxiety symptoms. Methods A total of 64 female patients with schizophrenia and anxiety symptoms of our hospital from January 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled, with 32 patients in each group. Anxiety and psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), respectively, at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 8. The dynamic changes in treatment efficacy, correlations between symptom improvements, differences in response and remission rates, and adverse events during treatment were compared between the two groups. Results Significant main effects of time were observed for both HAMA and PANSS total scores. A significant group×time interaction was observed for the PANSS total score, with the combination group showing superior efficacy to the monotherapy group from week 2 onward. For HAMA, only the main effect of group was significant, whereas the group×time interaction was not statistically significant. Overall, no significant correlations were observed between changes in HAMA and PANSS scores during any assessment interval, except for a weak correlation between the reduction in HAMA score and the reduction in PANSS positive-symptom score from baseline to week 2. At week 4, the anxiety response rate was higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (71.88% vs 25.00%). By week 8, the anxiety response rate was 100.00% in both groups, whereas only 9.38% of patients in the combination group achieved anxiety remission. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Olanzapine combined with oxazepam may accelerate the early improvement of psychotic symptoms and enhance the early anxiety response in patients with schizophrenia and anxiety symptoms without increasing short-term adverse events. However, its benefit for long-term complete remission of anxiety appears limited, and improvements in anxiety and psychotic symptoms appear to be relatively independent. Therefore, short-term, early, and as-needed use of oxazepam in combination with olanzapine is recommended.

Key words: schizophrenia, anxiety, olanzapine, oxazepam, adverse reactions

中图分类号: