临床荟萃 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1073-1077.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2025.12.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

降压干预在高危心血管病患者中的临床效益分析

严国胜(), 沈玉娟   

  1. 滨海县第二人民医院 心内科,江苏 盐城 224541
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2025-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 严国胜,Email:ygshaoyisheng@126.com

Analysis of the clinical benefits of antihypertensive interventions to high-risk cardiovascular patients

Yan Guosheng(), Shen Yujuan   

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Binhai County Second People's Hospital,Yancheng 224541,China
  • Received:2025-10-20 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2025-12-30
  • Contact: Yan Guosheng,Email:ygshaoyisheng@126.com

摘要:

目的 探讨降压干预在高危心血管病患者中的临床效益,为临床实践提供依据。方法 选取2015年1月-2020年12月就诊于滨海县第二人民医院来自八滩镇及其周边5个乡镇和2个场区的高血压患者45 823例,按降压干预时机分为早期降压组(确诊后3个月内启动规范降压治疗,n=22 938)和延迟降压组(确诊后3个月以上启动治疗,n=22 885)。依据降压目标值,将患者分为强化降压组(n=22 938)和常规降压组(n=22 885)。所有患者均采用个体化降压方案,给予单药或联合药物治疗。比较早期降压组和延迟降压组干预后血压控制达标率、心血管事件(冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病、脑卒中、心力衰竭、心血管死亡)发生率及主要不良心血管事件发生率,并分析强化降压组和常规降压组的临床效益和安全性。结果 早期降压组1年和3年血压控制达标率均高于延迟降压组(P<0.05)。在随访的 3 年中,早期降压组心血管事件发生率为15.0%(3 440例),延迟降压组心血管事件发生率为25.0%(5 721例),早期降压组心血管事件发生率低于延迟降压组(χ2=529.53,P<0.01)。与常规降压组(目标收缩压<140 mmHg)相比,强化降压组(目标收缩压<130 mmHg)主要心血管不良事件风险降低(P<0.01)。与延迟降压组相比,早期降压组心血管事件风险降低(P<0.01)。结论 对高危心血管病患者实施早期、强化降压干预可降低心血管事件风险。

关键词: 高血压, 高危心血管病患者, 降压治疗, 心血管事件, 预防效果

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical benefits of antihypertensive interventions to high-risk cardiovascular patients,thus providing evidence for clinical practice. Methods From January 2015 to December 2020,a total of 45 823 hypertension patients from Batan Town and its surrounding 5 towns and 2 fields who were treated in the Binhai County Second People's Hospital were selected. According to the timing of antihypertensive intervention,they were divided into the early antihypertensive group (standard antihypertensive treatment initiated within 3 months of diagnosis,n=22 938) and delayed antihypertensive group (standard antihypertensive treatment initiated 3 months later after diagnosis,n=22 885). According to the target value of blood pressure reduction,patients were further divided into the intensive blood pressure reduction group (n=22 938) and conventional blood pressure reduction group (n=22 885). All patients were treated with an individualized antihypertensive regimen of monotherapy or combined drug therapy. The blood pressure control compliance rate,the incidence of cardiovascular events (coronary atherosclerotic heart disease,stroke,heart failure,cardiovascular death) and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events were compared between the early antihypertensive group and the delayed antihypertensive group after interventions. Clinical benefits and safety in the intensive antihypertensive group and the conventional antihypertensive group were analyzed. Results The 1-year and 3-year blood pressure control rates in the early antihypertensive group were higher than those in the delayed antihypertensive group (P<0.05). During the 3 years of follow-up,the incidence of cardiovascular events in the early antihypertensive group was 15.0%(3 440 cases),and the incidence of cardiovascular events in the delayed antihypertensive group was 25.0%(5 721 cases). The incidence of cardiovascular events in the early antihypertensive group was lower than that in the delayed antihypertensive group (χ2=529.53,P<0.01).Compared with the conventional antihypertensive group (target systolic blood pressure < 140 mmHg),the risk of major cardiovascular adverse events in the intensive antihypertensive group (target systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg) was significantly lower (P<0.01). Compared with the delayed hypotension group,the risk of cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the early hypotension group (P<0.01). Conclusion Early and intensive antihypertensive interventions for high-risk cardiovascular patients can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

Key words: hypertension, high-risk cardiovascular patients, antihypertensive treatment, cardiovascular events, prevention effect

中图分类号: